In the grant_permission function, when result is False, what permission is assigned to the file?

In the grant_permission function, when result is False, what permission is assigned to the file?

• A. Read permission for owner, group, and others
• B. Read, write, execute for owner only
• C. No permissions
• D. Read and write for all

Answer: (A)

The main idea is to use a safe, minimal permission when the attempted grant doesn’t succeed. If the grant operation fails, the function falls back to giving everyone read access. This means the file is still viewable by the owner, the group, and others, but cannot be modified or executed. Granting read for all is a conservative default that preserves accessibility without opening the door to changes or runs that could cause security or integrity issues. This is preferable to giving no permissions, which would block access entirely, or to granting write or execute rights to some users, which would increase risk or violate the intended access level when the initial grant couldn’t be completed. Granting read for all provides a balanced, non-destructive fallback that keeps the file usable in typical workflows.

The main idea is to use a safe, minimal permission when the attempted grant doesn’t succeed. If the grant operation fails, the function falls back to giving everyone read access. This means the file is still viewable by the owner, the group, and others, but cannot be modified or executed. Granting read for all is a conservative default that preserves accessibility without opening the door to changes or runs that could cause security or integrity issues.

This is preferable to giving no permissions, which would block access entirely, or to granting write or execute rights to some users, which would increase risk or violate the intended access level when the initial grant couldn’t be completed. Granting read for all provides a balanced, non-destructive fallback that keeps the file usable in typical workflows.